Canonical murder 3: LB vol.1. Byknife on the door of Bryan Hartnell car part 1
Canonical murder 3_LB_vol_1_Byknife on the door
of Bryan Hartnell car part 1
Introduction
The third canonical murder of the self-proclaimed “zodiac killer” took
place on September 27, 1969 in the area of Lake Berryessa. Under oak trees, by
the water, Bryan Hartnell and Cecelia Shepard were stabbed by the costumed
executioner. The stabbing took place “at the beach south of the Ranch
Monticello Resort” (source: https://www.zodiackiller.com/LBReport7.html). Tom Voigt’s Zodiac Killer site
features extensive files of the LB report courtesy of the Napa County Sheriff’s
Department. The murderous attack took place around 6:15 in the afternoon. A
message was retrieved from the door of Bryan Hartnell’s car, left by the killer,
indicating a “time stamp” of 6:30 (obviously pm). The “Zodiac Cross” infamously
at the start of the “message” is followed by “Vallejo” then the two dates of
the first canonical attacks.
Figure 1. Message on Bryan Hartnell’s door left
by the killer (source: https://www.zodiackiller.com/KarmannGhia.html)
What immediately strikes out is that the killer changes protocol when
referencing the attack that took place minutes before the car door message. As SolidSnake1990
has pointed out, Sept stands out not because of the calendar attribute but
because it opens the way for further avenues to be considered. Sept, as a
notion of “sect” or “clan”.
I have studied the genealogical aspect of both canonical and
non-canonical victims. It provides the basis for what is, up to now, the sole
connection between the victims: even more so, the connection of the victims on
a genealogical basis also connects them to the Northern English roots of the
Pennington family, of whom “Peek-a-boo” Pennington is a descendant. Soze
has researched thoroughly the aspects of both genealogy and steganography
in relation to this case. It is my opinion that the Hartnell door message
touches upon both these fundamental pillars of the killer’s “modus operandi”.
And it is precisely where he states the literal “mo”: by knife. The
phrase with which he signs off the message.
Byknife: a hint at steganography?
At the definition of “byknife” (one word without blank character) one
reads (source: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/byknife) :
byknife (plural byknives)
- A
secondary knife carried beside a dagger or short sword. quotations ▲
- 1987, Church Monuments: Journal of
the Church Monuments Society, volume 2, page 5:
This may represent either the top of some form of closure, or the
pommel-cap of a byknife in the front of the sheath of the
dagger, the remains of which are represented as if hung between the two
suspension loops, its haft in front of the belt and its sheath behind the body
of the pouch. It is of a type known to contemporaries as a ballock knife, that
is a dagger with a phalliform haft or grip. An example of a byknife with
just such a fleur-de-lis pommel is in the collection of the Canterbury City
Museum.
Figure 2. Byknife sample (source: https://landsknechtemporium.com/products/daggers/Byknife/Lyse)
Can a “dagger inside a sword” be considered as a “message within a
message”, if this killer’s messaging was first and foremost via murder?
The outliers of the message are Latin alphabet and numerical data.
Richard Grinnell has
produced yet another thoughtful piece of work, documenting factual evidence and
interesting outliers concerning the message (source: https://www.zodiacciphers.com/zodiac-news/the-car-door-at-lake-berryessa). The dominant E-letter in plaintext is
certainly in unison with the Z408 frequency of letters, something I should like
to comment on further in another note.
“Vallejo” is a seven-letter plaintext offered right after the zodiac
cross. However it is inaccurate, since the first murder was in the City of
Benicia edge, actually in jurisdiction of Solano County Sheriff’s Department.
Lake Herman Pumping Station, accessed right through the gate of the Rambler
vehicle (Faraday) position (LHR murder site), where the two teenagers were
murdered, was indeed City of Benicia property, and the new pipelines installed
at the time were part of Benicia’s upgrade of the former Arsenal site as an
Industrial Park with Humble Oil refinery being the very stellar at the time.
So the “Vallejo” bland description is insufficient, if the dates and
message are taken at face value.
“Sept” would be certainly fitting the “September” word but one cannot
help but wonder if the “subdivision of the clan”, mentioned by Altug in the
Zodiac theory discord discussion as per September 2024, related also to the
“building of the second temple” (source: https://discord.com/channels/1260505612131897375/1260699395939373136/1289989543617101825).
Concerning the numerical data, SolidSnake1990 has offered not
only a comment on the “Sept” but also his attempt to decipher the numerical
information as “a layer for something else”.
Figure 3. SolidSnake1990 decipher of
numerical data from Hartnell’s door message (source: https://discord.com/channels/1260505612131897375/1260699395939373136/1289902997807042614)
A method for murder: a motive for murder?
I have claimed, time and time again, that genealogy is not only, in
general terms, a key to unlocking this mystery, but indeed the only (thus far)
connecting outlier between canonical victims. At the same time, the common root
of this outlier provides a direct historical link to the Pennington family. In
the attempt to develop a multi-tier historical system, where not all
descendants of the original 1400’s are slain, but specific descendants, one
comes across, once more, sept as a sub-division of clan: a specific branch of
descendants is targeted. Identifying the “pit-stops” along the way of
historical events (for example: the Great Puritan Migration, the early colonial
settlements of New England, the Mexican American war and the creation of the
State of California as part of the more perfect union, the Civil War) will
allow the researcher to reach the light at the end of the tunnel.
If genealogy is pivotal in the motive for the murders, then it should
also manifest itself as a method for the murder: that would be the killer’s actual
modus operandi.
In search of such information being projected at the Hartnell’s car door
message, I would have to treat it as the only letter that the killer left for
the Lake Berryessa attack; indeed, no other communication exists in written
form.
This means that one would have to apply, for the car door message, the
same meticulous method of scrutinizing every word and every digit offered by
the killer. This would also mean that such a message would have been
pre-decided: the element of “improvisation” simply cannot be considered, for
practical and indeed logical reasons. This would also mean that the killings cannot be random: a pre-determined message cannot be applied in randomly picked
victims.
With this in mind, I tried to concentrate the semantics of “Sept” as
follows.
The Concept of Sept and Genealogy in Celtic Culture
Genealogy and kinship have played a crucial role in shaping societies
throughout history. Among the Celtic peoples, particularly in Ireland and
Scotland, the concept of the sept was a fundamental social
structure that organized families and clans into cohesive units. Understanding
the sept system and its relationship with genealogy provides insight into how
Celtic societies maintained identity, inheritance, and loyalty over
generations. This essay explores the meaning of septs, their role in genealogy,
and their significance in Celtic culture.
A sept (from the Irish sliocht, meaning
"progeny" or "offspring") refers to a subdivision of a
larger clan or family group. Unlike the more familiar term clan,
which denotes a broad kinship group often linked by a common ancestor, a sept
was a smaller, more localized branch of that clan. Septs typically consisted of
related families who shared a surname or a variation of it, living in the same
territory and swearing allegiance to the clan chief.
In medieval Ireland and Scotland, clans were powerful political and
social entities, and septs functioned as their building blocks. For example,
the O’Neill clan in Ireland had numerous septs, such as the MacShanes or the
O’Donnellys, each with its own distinct lineage but still united under the
greater O’Neill name.
Genealogy was essential in Celtic societies for several reasons:
- Land and
Inheritance – Rights
to land and titles were often determined by bloodline. Detailed
genealogies ensured that property and leadership remained within the
correct family lineage.
- Political
Alliances –
Marriages between septs and clans were strategic, strengthening alliances.
Knowing one’s ancestry was crucial in negotiations and treaties.
- Social
Identity – A
person’s status, rights, and even legal standing were tied to their
lineage. Bards and historians (seanchaí) memorized genealogies to
preserve family histories.
In ancient Ireland, genealogies were recorded in texts such as The
Book of Invasions (Lebor Gabála Érenn) and The Annals of the
Four Masters, which traced noble families back to mythical or
semi-legendary ancestors. These records reinforced the legitimacy of ruling
dynasties and maintained cultural continuity.
The sept system began to weaken with English colonization, particularly
after the 16th and 17th centuries, when laws like the Statutes of Iona
(Scotland, 1609) and the Plantations of Ireland disrupted traditional clan
structures. Surnames were anglicized, and land ownership shifted away from
hereditary chiefs. Despite this, many modern descendants of Celtic clans still
take pride in their sept associations.
It is interesting to note that the notion of sept as well as clan
connects to an Irish and Scottish region of the world and a respective concept
of heraldry, very important for identity. The killer himself taunted and wrote
not about his name but his “identity”. The genealogical connections of the
canonical victims (and more) go through Ulster-Scott lineages: Irish immigrants
from a loyalist-northern British backdrop.
All canonical victims have a background lineage that identifies with the
regions of the world where sept and clan hold such significance and tie to
identity, estate/land and social perception (and indeed, position) of family.
It is also interesting to note that the social aspect of sept and
identity is diminished after the events linked to the plantations of Ulster as
well as the overall context of the Anglo-Irish conflict. In subsequent notes I
will try to highlight the overlap of dates where “killer’s events” coincide
with significant historical moments of that conflict.
From myth and legend to heraldry: ancient texts and identity
Lebor Gabála Érenn (The
Book of the Invasions of Ireland) is a medieval Irish text that recounts the
mythical history of Ireland, describing a series of invasions by different
supernatural and human groups.
Lebor Gabála Érenn is
one of the most important works of medieval Irish literature, blending
mythology, pseudo-history, and tradition. Compiled between the 9th and 12th
centuries, it synthesizes earlier oral traditions into a cohesive narrative,
presenting Ireland’s origins through successive waves of settlers, each
contributing to its cultural and spiritual landscape.
The text is structured around six major invasions, each led by a
different group. These include the people of Cessair, the Partholónians, the
Nemedians, the Fir Bolg, the Tuatha Dé Danann, and finally the Milesians
(Gaels). The narrative draws from biblical lore, classical learning, and native
Irish legends, creating a hybrid origin story that legitimizes Ireland’s place
in Christian and European history.
The first settlers, led by Cessair (a granddaughter of Noah), perish in
the biblical Flood, establishing a link between Ireland and sacred history.
Next, the Partholónians arrive, introducing agriculture and law but eventually
dying out from plague. These early cycles emphasize themes of creation and
destruction, framing Ireland as a land shaped by divine forces.
The Nemedians, who follow the Partholónians, battle oppressive
Fomorians—mythical sea raiders—before their society collapses. Survivors
scatter, with some returning as the Fir Bolg, who are later displaced by the
Tuatha Dé Danann. These cycles reflect struggles for sovereignty and the
cyclical nature of power in Irish myth.
The Tuatha Dé Danann, often interpreted as Ireland’s divine race, arrive
with magical prowess, wielding artifacts like the Stone of Fál and the spear of
Lugh. Their reign is marked by epic battles, including the First Battle of Mag
Tuired against the Fir Bolg and the Second Battle against the Fomorians,
symbolizing order triumphing over chaos.
The final invasion is led by the Milesians, ancestors of the modern
Irish. They defeat the Tuatha Dé Danann, who retreat into the Otherworld
(the sídhe), becoming Ireland’s fairy folk. This transition from
divine to human rule legitimizes Gaelic dominance, tying their lineage to
biblical and classical figures like Míl Espáine (a descendant of Noah).
Lebor Gabála Érenn reflects
medieval Ireland’s Christianization, framing its pagan myths within a biblical
chronology. The text aligns Irish kings with the genealogy of Adam and Noah,
while preserving native deities as fallen angels or ancient heroes. This
syncretism allowed Ireland to retain its cultural identity while integrating
into Christendom.
The text survives in multiple recensions, including those in the Book
of Leinster and the Book of Fermoy. Later versions expand
or modify the story, showing how the narrative evolved over time. These
variations highlight the fluidity of medieval Irish historiography, where oral
and written traditions intertwined.
Lebor Gabála Érenn served
as a foundational myth for medieval Irish identity, justifying political
dynasties and territorial claims.
From Wikipedia one reads
(source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebor_Gab%C3%A1la_%C3%89renn):
“The LGE seems to have been influenced by four major Christian works in
particular:
- St Augustine's De Civitate Dei, (The City of God), (413–426 AD)
- Orosius's Historiae adversum paganos,
"Histories", (417)
- Eusebius's Chronicon, translated into Latin by St Jerome as the Temporum liber (379)
- Isidore of Seville's Etymologiae ("Etymologies") (early 7th
century)”
It is interesting that Saint Augustine is brought up. In a follow up
note I will try to establish a connection between his works and another of the
killer’s canonical communications. For the time being, it should be also
important to underline the connection between the work of St. Augustine and St.
Jerome: his epistle begins the very first printed work – the bible of
Gutenberg.
Key-point
It seems that a line can be drawn from the Old Testament figures of
Noah, of whom Cessair (or Cesair) is a grand-daughter, linking thus to the
origins of sept and the very identity of the Irish – Celtic – Gaelic heritage
and heraldry, to Christianity, expressed in the early scholars of the
Latin-Christian tradition, whose legacy was maintained, after the split, in the
Roman Catholic Church.
The murder attack was committed on St Vincent de Paul’s day (September
27) observed by the Roman Catholic calendar. Cesair, “according to
the Lebor Gabála, she was the leader of the first inhabitants of Ireland,
arriving before the Biblical flood” (source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessair).
Sept and the Old Testament
By seeking a link between the specific word (term) of “Sept” and the Old
Testament, I came across this blatant piece of information:
From Wikipedia (source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septuagint):
“The Septuagint (/ˈsɛptjuədʒɪnt/ SEP-tew-ə-jint),[1] sometimes referred to as the Greek
Old Testament or The Translation of the Seventy (Koinē
Greek: Ἡ μετάφρασις τῶν Ἑβδομήκοντα, romanized: Hē metáphrasis tôn
Hebdomḗkonta), and
abbreviated as LXX,[2] is the earliest extant Greek translation
of the Hebrew Bible from the original Biblical
Hebrew.[3][4] The full Greek title derives from the
story recorded in the Letter
of Aristeas to
Philocrates that "the laws of the Jews" were translated into the Greek language at the request of Ptolemy II Philadelphus (285–247 BC) by seventy-two Hebrew translators—six from each of the Twelve Tribes of Israel.[5][6][7]”
The manuscripts (as saved in the Greek bible of the Codex Vaticanus)
offer a variable of 16-18 letters per line: that would be an average of 17
columns, which is the killer’s method for the Z408 and Z340 (24x17 and 20x17
respectively).
The Codex Alexandrinus offers a variable of 20 to 25 letters per line
which converges to the row-lengths of Z340 and Z408.
Sept 27 – 6:30: Proverbs
The aforementioned Codex Alexandrinus features a complete list of the Septuagint
index of Old Testament books translated into Greek.
Table 1 features an analytical list (source: https://4marksofthechurch.com/biblical-canon-of-the-septuagint/) of the “Greek Old Testament”.
Table 1. Translation of the Seventy (εβδομήκοντα) of the Old
Testament (non-Hebraic canon) unto Greek
The 27th book is the Proverbs.
Regardless and independent of this indexing, Proverbs is identified as
the 27th book of the “Greek Old Testament” ecclesiastic canon.
The original canon agreed by both the Eastern Church and agreed
(eventually) by the Pope was agreed upon in the Quinisext Council (Latin: Concilium Quinisextum; Koinē
Greek: Πενθέκτη Σύνοδος, romanized: Penthékti
Sýnodos, literally meaning, Fifth-Sixth Meeting), i.e.,
the Fifth-Sixth Council, often called the Council in Trullo, Trullan
Council, or the Penthekte Synod, was a church council held in 692 at Constantinople. (source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quinisext_Council)
According to the Orthodox Church, this was the canon agreed upon with
the Roman Catholic Church (pre-schism). Another validated source is https://www.oca.org/questions/scripture/canon-of-scripture.
Table 2 features the analytical canon of the Old Testament books (Greek Septuagint
translation).
Table 2. Canon of the Old Testament books
(Greek Septuagint translation)
|
Greek
name |
Transliteration |
English
name |
|
Law |
||
|
Γένεσις |
Genesis |
Genesis |
|
Ἔξοδος |
Exodos |
Exodus |
|
Λευϊτικόν |
Leuitikon |
Leviticus |
|
Ἀριθμοί |
Arithmoi |
Numbers |
|
Δευτερονόμιον |
Deuteronomion |
Deuteronomy |
|
History |
||
|
Ἰησοῦς |
Iēsous |
Joshua |
|
Κριταί |
Kritai |
Judges |
|
Ῥούθ |
Routh |
Ruth |
|
Βασιλειῶν Αʹ[d] |
1
Basileiōn |
Kings I
(I Samuel) |
|
Βασιλειῶν Βʹ |
2
Basileiōn |
Kings II
(II Samuel) |
|
Βασιλειῶν Γʹ |
3
Basileiōn |
Kings
III (I Kings) |
|
Βασιλειῶν Δʹ |
4
Basileiōn |
Kings IV
(II Kings) |
|
Παραλειπομένων
Αʹ |
1
Paraleipomenōn[e] |
Chronicles
I |
|
Παραλειπομένων
Βʹ |
2
Paraleipomenōn |
Chronicles
II |
|
Ἔσδρας Αʹ |
1 Esdras |
|
|
Ἔσδρας Βʹ |
2 Esdras |
Ezra-Nehemiah |
|
Ἐσθήρ |
Esthēr |
Esther[f] |
|
Ἰουδίθ |
Ioudith |
Judith |
|
Τωβίτ[g] |
Tōbit[h] |
Tobit |
|
Μακκαβαίων
Αʹ |
Maccabees
I |
|
|
Μακκαβαίων
Βʹ |
Maccabees
II |
|
|
Μακκαβαίων
Γʹ |
Maccabees
III |
|
|
Wisdom |
||
|
Ψαλμοί |
Psalmoi |
Psalms |
|
Ψαλμός
ΡΝΑʹ |
Psalmos
151 |
|
|
Προσευχὴ Μανασσῆ |
Proseuchē
Manassē |
|
|
Ὠδαί |
Odai |
|
|
Παροιμίαι |
Paroimiai |
Proverbs |
|
Ἐκκλησιαστής |
Ekklēsiastēs |
|
|
Ἆσμα Ἀσμάτων |
Song of
Songs or Song of Solomon or Canticle of Canticles |
|
|
Ἰώβ |
Iōb |
|
|
Σοφία
Σαλομῶντος |
Sophia
Salomōntos |
Wisdom
or Wisdom of Solomon |
|
Σοφία Ἰησοῦ Σειράχ |
Sirach
or Ecclesiasticus or Wisdom of Sirach |
|
|
Prophets |
||
|
Ὡσηέ Αʹ |
I. Hōsēe |
Hosea |
|
Ἀμώς Βʹ |
II. Āmōs |
Amos |
|
Μιχαίας
Γʹ |
III.
Michaias |
Micah |
|
Ἰωήλ Δʹ |
IV. Iōēl |
Joel |
|
Ὀβδιού Εʹ[i] |
V.
Obdiou |
Obadiah |
|
Ἰωνᾶς Ϛ' |
VI.
Iōnas |
Jonah |
|
Ναούμ Ζʹ |
VII.
Naoum |
Nahum |
|
Ἀμβακούμ Ηʹ |
VIII.
Ambakoum |
Habakkuk |
|
Σοφονίας
Θʹ |
IX.
Sophonias |
Zephaniah |
|
Ἀγγαῖος Ιʹ |
X.
Angaios |
Haggai |
|
Ζαχαρίας
ΙΑʹ |
XI.
Zacharias |
Zachariah |
|
Μαλαχίας
ΙΒʹ |
XII.
Malachias |
Malachi |
|
Ἠσαΐας |
Ēsaias |
Isaiah |
|
Ἱερεμίας |
Hieremias |
Jeremiah |
|
Βαρούχ |
Barouch |
Baruch |
|
Θρῆνοι |
Thrēnoi |
Lamentations |
|
Ἐπιστολὴ Ἰερεμίου |
Letter
of Jeremiah |
|
|
Ἰεζεκιήλ |
Iezekiēl |
Ezekiel |
|
Δανιήλ |
Daniēl |
Daniel[j] |
|
Appendix |
||
|
Μακκαβαίων
Δ' |
Maccabees
IV |
|
|
Ψαλμοὶ Σαλομῶντος |
Psalms
of Solomon |
|
We can see that Proverbs is the 27th book. The deviation from
the original list concerns the “4 Maccabees” book, featured in the Appendix of
Bible editions. Further editions of the Roman Catholic Bible have also removed
Psalm 151 from the Canon. In any case, the index 27 which also satisfies the
“6:30” verse existence concerns the Proverbs. To confirm that, I searched all
books of the “Wisdom” for a possible existence of a “6:30” verse (Table 3).
Table 3. Query of the “Wisdom” books as per
6:30 verse existence
Proverbs 27 – 6:30: A warning against adultery
The verse is part of the 6:30-35 end of Proverbs 6 and reads (source: https://biblehub.com/sep/proverbs/6.htm):
30It is not to be
wondered at if one should be taken stealing, for he steals that when hungry he
may satisfy his soul:
31but if he
should be taken, he shall repay sevenfold, and shall deliver himself by giving
all his goods.
32But the
adulterer through want of sense procures destruction to his soul.
33He endures
both pain and disgrace, and his reproach shall never be wiped off.
34For the
soul of her husband is full of jealousy: he will not spare in the day of
vengeance.
35He will not
forego his enmity for any ransom: neither will he be
reconciled for many gifts.
From: The English translation of The Septuagint by Sir Lancelot Charles
Lee Brenton (1851)
This is the final
section of Proverbs 6 and deals with the issue of adultery. For a proper
understanding of context, the whole second section of Proverbs 6 (6:20-6:35)
reads as such (source: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs%206&version=NIV):
Is this a message directed at the victims of the murderous attack, lying
under the oak trees by the water, tied up and left to bleed to their deaths?
Either from the Septuagint canon index or – more importantly – the
ecclesiastic synod canon of Old Testament (from Greek) that places Proverbs in
any case at index 27 (and the only of the three Wisdom books with such a verse
that can identify with that index), the “6:30” section begins the accusation
(and warning) against adultery.
Was the wanton destruction of human life, the senseless, unjustified,
insane brutal attack, a scheme of the killer that points out at the “sin of
adultery” for two young people who were once together, had since moved on and
who re-united briefly when they met again at Pacific Union College - Angwin?
Only to be fiercely attacked by a madman who saw himself as Lord High
Executioner and the hand of his own misplaced mad version of “divine
retribution”?
Did the killer stalk them and knew of this information?
Sunday April 20, 2025
SDS
Comments
Post a Comment